Social
- HOME
- Sustainability
- Social
- Performance Data (Social)
Performance Data (Social)
Number of employees*1
KPI | Unit | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AISIN Group | Non-consolidated | persons | 14,439 | 14,986 | 15,493 | 36,489 | 35,610 | |
Global | 119,732 | 119,535 | 118,359 | 117,177 | 116,649 |
Permanent employees
KPI | Unit | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Permanent employees by gender and ratio of women | Non-consolidated | Male | persons | 13,098 | 13,356 | 13,418 | 33,467 | 32,677 |
Female | 1,905 | 1,987 | 2,073 | 4,377 | 4,331 | |||
Ratio of women | % | 12.7 | 13.0 | 13.4 | 11.6 | 11.7 | ||
Global | Male | persons | - | - | - | 97,754 | 97,445 | |
Female | - | - | - | 19,989 | 20,216 | |||
Ratio of women | % | - | - | - | 17.1 | 17.2 | ||
Permanent employees by age group |
Non-consolidated | Under 30 years old |
% | - | - | - | 23.6 | 21.5 |
From 30 to under 50 years old |
- | - | - | 59.3 | 60.1 | |||
50 years old or higher |
- | - | - | 17.1 | 18.4 | |||
4 companies |
Under 30 years old |
- | - | - | 23.7 | 22.4 | ||
From 30 to under 50 years old |
- | - | - | 56.9 | 58.9 | |||
50 years old or higher |
- | - | - | 17.5 | 19.0 | |||
Ratio of mid-career employees among permanent employees |
Non-consolidated | Male | persons | 2,687 | 2,809 | 2,948 | 10,826 | 10,624 |
Female | 573 | 618 | 673 | 1,258 | 1,262 | |||
Ratio of mid-career employees |
% | 21.7 | 22.3 | 23.4 | 31.9 | 32.1 | ||
4 companies |
Male | persons | - | - | - | 11,907 | 11,614 | |
Female | - | - | - | 1,355 | 1,357 | |||
Ratio of mid-career employees |
% | - | - | - | 28.7 | 28.6 |
Regular recruitment
KPI | Unit | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General administrative positions | Non-consolidated | Male | persons | 17 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 15 |
Female | 8 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 8 | |||
Ratio of women | % | 32.0 | 30.4 | 34.5 | 50.0 | 34.8 | ||
General technical positions | Non-consolidated | Male | persons | 105 | 135 | 106 | 114 | 107 |
Female | 13 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 26 | |||
Ratio of women | % | 11.0 | 8.2 | 11.7 | 11.6 | 19.5 | ||
Skilled positions | Non-consolidated | Male | persons | 219 | 326 | 250 | 151 | 141 |
Female | 34 | 69 | 54 | 32 | 40 | |||
Ratio of women | % | 13.4 | 17.5 | 17.8 | 17.5 | 22.1 | ||
General office work | Non-consolidated | Male | persons | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Female | 16 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 0 | |||
Ratio of women | % | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
General administrative positions | 4 companies |
Male | persons | 61 | 57 | 40 | 16 | 24 |
Female | 25 | 29 | 20 | 12 | 15 | |||
Ratio of women | % | 29.1 | 33.7 | 33.3 | 42.9 | 38.5 | ||
General technical positions | 4 companies |
Male | persons | 290 | 404 | 251 | 153 | 167 |
Female | 35 | 39 | 27 | 24 | 32 | |||
Ratio of women | % | 10.8 | 8.8 | 9.7 | 13.6 | 16.1 | ||
Skilled positions | 4 companies |
Male | persons | 1,002 | 1,382 | 754 | 304 | 304 |
Female | 213 | 356 | 146 | 72 | 78 | |||
Ratio of women | % | 17.5 | 20.5 | 16.2 | 19.1 | 20.4 | ||
General office work | 4 companies |
Male | persons | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Female | 28 | 26 | 17 | 1 | 0 | |||
Ratio of women | % | 93.3 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 33.3 | 0.0 |
Hiring of mid-career
employees
KPI | Unit | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ratio of mid-career employees hired |
Non-consolidated | Male | persons | 152 | 127 | 138 | 79 | 111 |
Female | 44 | 31 | 49 | 14 | 28 | |||
Ratio of women | % | 22.4 | 19.6 | 26.2 | 15.1 | 20.1 | ||
Ratio of mid-career employees |
32.2 | 21.5 | 28.6 | 22.0 | 29.1 | 4 companies |
Male | persons | 227 | 160 | 168 | 114 | 156 |
Female | 49 | 38 | 54 | 18 | 36 | |||
Ratio of women | % | 17.8 | 19.2 | 24.3 | 13.6 | 18.8 | ||
Ratio of mid-career employees |
14.3 | 7.9 | 15.0 | 18.4 | 23.6 |
Investment in employees
KPI | Unit | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Annual hours of training per employee |
Non-consolidated | hours | 39.6 | 40.9 | 56.3 | 39.7 | 46.0 | |
4 companies |
32.0 | 31.3 | 38.8 | 38.5 | 43.9 | |||
Total hours of employee training |
Non-consolidated | hours | 562,179 | 627,637 | 872,787 | 1,503,028 | 1,701,289 | |
4 companies |
1,308,015 | 1,399,237 | 1,784,911 | 1,750,754 | 1,961,521 | |||
Annual days of training per employee |
Non-consolidated | day | 4.9 | 5.1 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 5.8 | |
4 companies |
4.0 | 3.9 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 5.5 | |||
Total training expenditure | Non-consolidated | yen | 393,382,000 | 368,450,000 | 418,649,000 | 720,087,000 | 760,482,000 | |
4 companies |
- | - | - | 977,405,174 | 1,009,454,417 |
Job satisfaction (Engagement)
KPI | Unit | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Job satisfaction (according to results of employee awareness survey)*2 |
Non-consolidated | Average value |
3.4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.4 | |
4 companies |
- | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | |||
12 companies | - | - | - | 3.4 | 3.4 | |||
Turnover (resignation) | Non-consolidated | % | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.9 | |
4 companies |
1.3 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Diversity and inclusion
KPI | Unit | FY 2019 |
FY 2020 |
FY 2021 |
FY 2022 |
FY 2023 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ratio of female Executive Management*3 | Non-consolidated | Executive Management | Male | persons | 13 | 13 | 10 | 9 | 9 |
Female | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | 7.1 | 7.1 | 23.1 | 25.0 | 25.0 | |||
Ratio of female managers | Non-consolidated | Department heads | Male | persons | 515 | 539 | 546 | 1,157 | 1,161 |
Female | 8 | 13 | 17 | 25 | 27 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | 1.53 | 2.36 | 3.02 | 2.12 | 2.27 | |||
Section heads | Male | persons | 1,552 | 1,639 | 1,710 | 3,314 | 3,458 | ||
Female | 49 | 56 | 59 | 95 | 103 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | 3.06 | 3.30 | 3.34 | 2.79 | 2.89 | |||
Management staff | Male | persons | 2,067 | 2,178 | 2,256 | 4,471 | 4,619 | ||
Female | 57 | 69 | 76 | 120 | 130 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | 2.68 | 3.07 | 3.26 | 2.61 | 2.74 | |||
Ratio of female team leaders | Non-consolidated | Team heads | Male | persons | 3,507 | 3,641 | 3,807 | 5,719 | 5,800 |
Female | 166 | 175 | 200 | 229 | 292 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | 4.52 | 4.59 | 4.99 | 3.85 | 4.79 | |||
Ratio of female managers | 4 companies |
Department heads | Male | persons | 1,276 | 1,378 | 1,409 | 1,440 | 1,466 |
Female | 8 | 13 | 21 | 27 | 29 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | 0.62 | 0.93 | 1.47 | 1.84 | 1.94 | |||
Section heads | Male | persons | 3,165 | 3,467 | 3,654 | 3,718 | 4,029 | ||
Female | 61 | 74 | 83 | 104 | 112 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | 1.89 | 2.09 | 2.22 | 2.72 | 2.70 | |||
Management staff | Male | persons | 4,441 | 4,845 | 5,063 | 5,158 | 5,495 | ||
Female | 69 | 87 | 104 | 131 | 141 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | 1.53 | 1.76 | 2.01 | 2.48 | 2.50 | |||
Ratio of female team leaders | 4 companies |
Team heads | Male | persons | - | - | - | 6,786 | 6,930 |
Female | - | - | - | 255 | 333 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | - | - | - | 3.62 | 4.58 | |||
Ratio of female Executive Management*4 |
Global | Executive Management | Male | persons | - | - | - | 529 | 527 |
Female | - | - | - | 10 | 12 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | - | - | - | 1.9 | 2.2 | |||
Ratio of female managers | Global | Department heads | Male | persons | - | - | - | 2,917 | 2,969 |
Female | - | - | - | 148 | 155 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | - | - | - | 4.8 | 5.0 | |||
Section heads | Male | persons | - | - | - | 6,241 | 6,559 | ||
Female | - | - | - | 459 | 509 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | - | - | - | 6.9 | 7.2 | |||
Management staff | Male | persons | - | - | - | 9,158 | 9,528 | ||
Female | - | - | - | 607 | 664 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | - | - | - | 6.2 | 6.5 | |||
Newly appointed managers | Non-consolidated | Male | persons | - | - | - | 361 | 380 | |
Female | - | - | - | 29 | 13 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | - | - | - | 7.4 | 3.3 | |||
4 companies |
Male | persons | - | - | - | 408 | 442 | ||
Female | - | - | - | 31 | 13 | ||||
Ratio of women | % | - | - | - | 7.1 | 2.9 | |||
Ratio of mid-career employees in management positions | Non-consolidated | Male mid-career managers | persons | 496 | 558 | 596 | 1,156 | 1,235 | |
Female mid-career managers | 14 | 18 | 21 | 32 | 35 | ||||
Ratio of mid-career employees in management positions |
% | 24.0 | 25.6 | 26.5 | 25.9 | 26.9 | |||
4 companies |
Male mid-career managers | persons | - | - | - | 1,238 | 1,260 | ||
Female mid-career managers | - | - | - | 33 | 35 | ||||
Ratio of mid-career employees in management positions |
% | - | - | - | 24.0 | 23.2 | |||
Difference in wages between male and female workers*5 |
Non-consolidated | All workers | % | - | - | - | - | 74.9 | |
Regular employees | - | - | - | - | 76.2 | ||||
Part-time and fixed-term workers |
- | - | - | - | 80.1 | ||||
Percentage of local employees among executives (executive vice president level and above) at overseas subsidiaries*6 |
Non-consolidated*7 | Local employees | persons | 72 | 73 | 87 | 71 | 75 | |
Non-consolidated | Number of posts | posts | 217 | 222 | 243 | 208 | 217 | ||
Ratio of local employees | % | 33.2 | 32.9 | 35.8 | 34.1 | 34.6 | |||
Global | Local employees | persons | 107 | 112 | 122 | 106 | 110 | ||
Number of posts | posts | 317 | 337 | 337 | 304 | 318 | |||
Ratio of local employees | % | 33.8 | 33.2 | 36.2 | 34.9 | 34.6 | |||
Ratio of union members in our Group companies operating in countries with labor unions |
Of the 20 countries in which we operate, 11 countries have a union system. |
% | - | - | 92.2 | 94.9 | 97.6 | ||
Re-employment rate | Non-consolidated | Employees with advanced qualifications |
% | 76.9 | 73.3 | 75.3 | 82.9 | 78.7 | |
Union members | 81.2 | 83.2 | 75.8 | 85.4 | 78.3 | ||||
Whole | 79.7 | 79.4 | 75.6 | 84.6 | 78.5 | ||||
4 companies |
Employees with advanced qualifications |
79.6 | 76.5 | 83.0 | 84.3 | 80.9 | |||
Union members | 81.3 | 89.5 | 80.6 | 84.3 | 78.2 | ||||
Whole | 80.7 | 85.5 | 81.5 | 84.3 | 79.4 | ||||
Hiring of employees with disabilities |
Non-consolidated | persons | 236 | 244 | 296 | 687 | 702 | ||
% | 2.20 | 2.16 | 2.37 | 2.41 | 2.49 | ||||
4 companies |
persons | 697 | 780 | 857 | 855 | 872 | |||
% | 2.14 | 2.16 | 2.32 | 2.42 | 2.48 | ||||
Employment rate at “Special Subsidiaries” (a system in Japan to provide special accommodations for people with disabilities)*8 |
% | - | - | 2.37 | 2.50 | 2.61 | |||
(Source: Statutory Employment Rates) |
% | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
Work-life balance
KPI | Unit | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total working hours | Non-consolidated | hours | 2,117 | 2,061 | 1,930 | 1,990 | 1,958 | |
4 companies |
2,146 | 2,071 | 1,941 | 1,998 | 1,969 | |||
Paid leave taken*9 | Non-consolidated | % | 98.9 | 98.7 | 98.0 | 95.4 | 101.0 | |
4 companies |
95.7 | 95.9 | 95.6 | 95.3 | 100.7 | |||
Average number of years worked | Non-consolidated | Male | year | 16.1 | 16.2 | 16.5 | 16.2 | 16.2 |
Female | 12.8 | 12.9 | 13.1 | 12.7 | 12.7 | |||
Whole | 15.7 | 15.8 | 16.0 | 15.8 | 15.8 | |||
4 companies |
Male | 14.9 | 15.3 | 15.6 | 16.3 | 16.4 | ||
Female | 9.90 | 10.4 | 10.8 | 11.6 | 12.0 | |||
Whole | 14.4 | 14.8 | 15.0 | 15.8 | 15.9 | |||
Average non-statutory working hours per month*10 | Non-consolidated | hours | 29.7 | 25.0 | 16.2 | 24.3 | 26.1 | |
Ratio of male employees using parental leave systems*11 |
% | 6.0 | 8.7 | 12.2 | 17.2 | 34.0 | ||
Percentage of male employees taking childcare leave and holidays for childcare purposes*12 |
- | - | - | - | 95.7 | |||
Ratio of achievement of the target of ensuring that all male employees with a baby take paternity leave*13 |
- | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||
Ratio of male employees using parental leave systems |
4 companies |
% | - | - | 21.1 | 17.9 | 33.2 | |
Percentage of male employees taking childcare leave and holidays for childcare purposes |
- | - | - | - | 95.5 | |||
Ratio of achievement of the target of ensuring that all male employees with a baby take paternity leave |
- | - | - | 100.0 | 99.6 | |||
Number of employees working reduced hours to accommodate childcare |
Non-consolidated | Male | persons | 129 | 153 | 118 | 427 | 412 |
Female | 346 | 409 | 409 | 837 | 874 | |||
Total | 475 | 562 | 527 | 1,264 | 1,286 | |||
4 companies |
Male | 149 | 190 | 162 | 453 | 480 | ||
Female | 728 | 848 | 907 | 974 | 1,012 | |||
Total | 877 | 1,038 | 1,069 | 1,427 | 1,492 | |||
Number of employees using family-care leave support systems |
Non-consolidated | Male | persons | 8 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 4 |
Female | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |||
Total | 14 | 6 | 6 | 13 | 13 | |||
4 companies |
Male | 12 | 11 | 6 | 12 | 8 | ||
Female | 8 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 9 | |||
Total | 20 | 27 | 18 | 16 | 17 |
Labor safety and health
KPI | Unit | FY2019 | FY2020 | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rate of disabling injuries occurring in the workplace |
Non-consolidated | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
12 companies | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.17 |
* Note: The four companies for FY2022 and thereafter: Aisin, Aisin Takaoka, Aisin Chemical and ADVICS The five companies in and before FY2021 = Aisin Seiki, Aisin Takaoka, Aisin Chemical, Aisin AW, and ADVICS
- Number of employees: excludes employees seconded from Aisin to outside the company, but includes employees seconded from outside the company to Aisin; the information is disclosed in our Securities Reports.
- Job satisfaction: Evaluated on a 5-point scale and measured through questions about “job fulfillment“ and “job adaptability.“
- Ratio of female executives (non-consolidated): Members of the Board of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members (The information is disclosed in our Securities Reports.)
- Ratio of female executives (global): 73 companies in Japan and 115 companies overseas (President, Executive Vice President, and Members of the Board of Directors)
- Difference in wages between male and female workers: Calculated based on the provisions of the Japanese law "Act on the Promotion of Women's Active Engagement in Professional Life" (Act No. 64 of 2015). The main reason for the wage disparity among regular workers is the difference in the composition ratio by occupational qualification. There is no difference in standard wages by occupational qualification. However, a disparity exists in the average wage of all regular employees since more women join us, which has lowered the average age.
- Percentage of local employees among executives (Executive Vice President level and above, or the President, Executive Vice President, and Members of the Board of Directors) at 115 overseas subsidiaries
- Non-consolidated: 74 overseas subsidiaries of the AISIN Group
- Employment rate at “Special Subsidiaries”: Companies to which the system applies are as follows: Applicable companies in FY2021 and FY2022:Aisin WellSmile, Aisin, and Aisin Collabo Applicable companies in FY2023 : Aisin WellSmile, Aisin, Aisin Collabo, Aisin Takaoka, Aisin Chemical, and ADVICS
- Paid leave acquisition rate: The denominator is the number of days granted in a single year. In addition to the number of days of paid leave taken, the numerator also includes the number of days taken for Anshin (secured) holidays (a system that allows an employee to accumulate up to 20 days of expiring paid leave and use them for personal injury or illness, nursing care, or childbirth and childcare).
- Average non-statutory working hours in October: The average for union members
- Rate of childcare leave taken by male employees: From FY2019 to FY2022, figures were counted for those who took childcare leave within the relevant year. Starting in FY2023, based on the provisions of the Japanese law "Act on Childcare Leave, Caregiver Leave, and Other Measures for the Welfare of Workers Caring for Children or Other Family Members" (Act No. 76 of 1991), we calculate the rate of childcare leave, etc. taken under Article 71-4, Item 1 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Act on Childcare Leave, Caregiver Leave, and Other Measures for the Welfare of Workers Caring for Children or Other Family Members (Ordinance of the Ministry of Labour No. 25 of 1991).
- Percentage of male employees taking childcare leave and holidays for childcare purposes: The rate of childcare leave and holidays for childcare purposes taken under Article 71-4, Item 2 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Act on Childcare Leave, Caregiver Leave, and Other Measures for the Welfare of Workers Caring for Children or Other Family Members (Ordinance of the Ministry of Labour No. 25 of 1991), based on the provisions of the Japanese law "Act on Childcare Leave, Caregiver Leave, and Other Measures for the Welfare of Workers Caring for Children or Other Family Members" (Act No. 76 of 1991) The rate may exceed 100% if there are male workers who took childcare leave or holidays for childcare purposes in a different year from the year in which their spouses gave birth. Holidays for childcare purposes include special leave (a system that allows a father of children below two years of age to take five days of leave per child to attend his wife’s childbirth and/or take care of their children) and Anshin (secured) holidays.
- Ratio of achievement of the target of ensuring that all male employees with a baby take paternity leave: childcare leave and holidays for childcare purposes (special holidays and Anshin (secured) holidays)